🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a clear warning from the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in Russian state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to determine in the coming days on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic stability.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory actions, including seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in European nations are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she stated. "It also sends a clear signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."